Av rating:
Total votes: 32
Total comments: 6


Phil Factor
The Walrus and the Manager
05 June 2008

Why do Phil's eyes water whenever he hears the poem 'The Walrus and the Carpenter'? Is it the voice of his conscience or memories of struggles selling software services to large companies? Why does he identify so strongly with the eldest oyster?


'... and shed a bitter tear'.

I once worked for an international company who did a study to find out why so many of its suppliers had disappeared. The subsequent report made disturbing reading. The report revealed what could best be described as the "Walrus and the Carpenter" effect. Even today I can't read Lewis Carroll's poem, The Walrus and the Carpenter, without a lump in the throat.

Much of the work of a manager in a manufacturing company is to create and foster relationships with suppliers. It is true of any IT departments too, where many applications and services are bought in, rather than created in-house. Who'd want to write and maintain their own payroll package, for example? However, in such a relationship, there is a lot of work to do to make sure both sides obtain maximum benefit. If you get it wrong, it can cause real suffering.

The poem introduces the walrus and the carpenter walking along the beach at night. To me, the Walrus represents the complacent corporate organisation. The lethargy, and the layers of blubber, speak volumes. The Carpenter is obviously a project manager.

The Walrus and the Carpenter

Were walking close at hand;

They wept like anything to see

Such quantities of sand:

"If this were only cleared away,"

They said, "it would be grand!"

"If seven maids with seven mops

Swept it for half a year.

Do you suppose," the Walrus said,

"That they could get it clear?"

"I doubt it," said the Carpenter,

And shed a bitter tear.

Note the subtlety of the dialogue; the naïve trust of corporate reasoning that projects that are 'slipping their dates' just need additional headcount to ensure that they come in on time, and the wise riposte of the Carpenter. In IT, such a practice usually leads to tears.

.

I learned very early on in business that it is safest to enter into commercial relationships only with companies of a similar size to your own. This is why IT salesmen who sell applications and services to corporates always trot out their revenues and projected growth at the start of their PowerPoint Presentations. An experienced manager will be nervous of buying from a small company - 'The Oyster': But not these two characters, it seems.

"O Oysters, come and walk with us!"

The Walrus did beseech.

"A pleasant walk, a pleasant talk,

Along the briny beach:

We cannot do with more than four,

To give a hand to each."

The corporate is, suspiciously, encouraging the 'oysters'. For a small supplier, the idea of forming a relationship with the IT department of a large company is beguiling. Once you are in place, with a good maintenance contract, the future looks rosy. Many IT managers in large businesses will encourage this idea of "synergistic" business opportunities with smaller partners, as they know that it will generally give them the "upper hand" in most of their dealings. However, the oysters should be very wary of placing their fortunes and future completely at the mercy of the company. Suddenly we meet the old 'Phil Factor' oyster. He has already seen the consequences.

The eldest Oyster looked at him,

But never a word he said:

The eldest Oyster winked his eye,

And shook his heavy head--

Meaning to say he did not choose

To leave the oyster-bed.

Tie up the resources of a growing company in a commercial relationship with a single large one? Get distracted from developing other commercial links by the promise of easy money from this single source? What happens when the contract is renegotiated, and you've let other revenues atrophy? The oyster will want to neglect the natural predatory instincts of the walrus, but he does so at his peril. Sadly, the temptation is just too great for the less experienced.

But four young Oysters hurried up,

All eager for the treat:

Their coats were brushed, their faces washed,

Their shoes were clean and neat--

And this was odd, because, you know,

They hadn't any feet.

Out of their natural element they go, beguiled by the false expectations of doing business with a large company, and deaf to the warnings of the old oyster, Uncle Phil. From the description, it is the sales reps who make the running. Wiser counsels are usually forgotten in the stampede for corporate sales.

The problem is that small companies often require a large investment just to survive the ups and downs of negotiation over a contract, which can be protracted. They generally don't have the funds readily available and so take out loans in expectation of the revenue streams to come. Even if they succeed, and win a contract, they often have to expand just to service that contract.

Four other Oysters followed them,

And yet another four;

And thick and fast they came at last,

And more, and more, and more--

All hopping through the frothy waves,

And scrambling to the shore.

And how the talking can go on…and on. Meeting after meeting, with always the promise that this last presentation will close the deal. Then the manager is changed and you have to start again.

"The time has come," the Walrus said,

"To talk of many things:

Of shoes--and ships--and sealing-wax--

Of cabbages--and kings--

And why the sea is boiling hot--

And whether pigs have wings."


'The time has come to talk of many things.'

The weeks turn to months. Then come the changes in requirements, the changes in scope and the delays. Sometimes these delays are for no better reason than the manager has lost the file or is distracted by things that seem more important at the time. I knew a sad senior manager who called in salesmen from potential suppliers for meetings, merely because they were the only people who were ever pleasant to him.

It is fine for a medium sized or large business to take on a large account. The resources are there, they have people specially trained to do account management. The small businesses, on the other hand, are forced by their size to field people without the training for the ordeal.

"But wait a bit," the Oysters cried,

"Before we have our chat;

For some of us are out of breath,

And all of us are fat!"

"No hurry!" said the Carpenter.

They thanked him much for that.

And then there is the awful moment when it dawns on an over-extended small company that a synergistic relationship was never on the cards. The large company has beguiled them into doing a free business analysis, received a great deal of specialised information, and will often have got them to write all the documentation for them.

A loaf of bread," the Walrus said,

"Is what we chiefly need:

Pepper and vinegar besides

Are very good indeed--

Now if you're ready, Oysters dear,

We can begin to feed."

"But not on us!" the Oysters cried,

Turning a little blue.

"After such kindness, that would be

A dismal thing to do!"

"The night is fine," the Walrus said.

"Do you admire the view?

Eventually, the banks who have loaned the money to the small company realise that a deal isn't on the cards and call in the loan. The company will have put so much energy into the deal that it will make them very vulnerable. Even if the deal goes through, the Oyster suddenly realises the dangers of shedding all those fixed assets that have been put in place purely for the project, if the deal is terminated or renegotiated.

"I weep for you," the Walrus said:

"I deeply sympathize."

With sobs and tears he sorted out

Those of the largest size,

Holding his pocket-handkerchief

Before his streaming eyes.

"O Oysters," said the Carpenter,

"You've had a pleasant run!

Shall we be trotting home again?'

But answer came there none--

And this was scarcely odd, because

They'd eaten every one.


'You've had a pleasant run'

There was, certainly a great deal of hand-wringing amongst the senior management of the company when they discovered why 'answer came there none' from their suppliers. The company was suffering for the sins of its own management, who had exploited their positions. A great deal of regret was expressed. Practices were tightened up; even the one of using one's suppliers as unofficial banks by being late in payments was banned.

The carpenter seems surprised at the demise of the oysters. Indeed, many project managers in government or large corporate have no idea of the damage their delays and dithering can do to a smaller company. The walrus, however has deliberately planned their destruction even whilst protesting his regret and compassion. It isn't entirely a mistake.

Oysters may be eager to join the big boys at the dinner table but responsible organizations will only dine with those of a similar size to themselves. On the seashore of commercial life, it is harder, after all, to absent-mindedly eat a walrus than an oyster.

Phil Factor's first Ebook 'Confessions of an IT Manager' is a free download to anyone who registers for Joel Spolsky's, and Neil Davidson's, Business Of Software 2008 conference. This Conference should be of interest to anyone who is, or has been, in the business of software, whether they are programmers, product managers, development managers, marketeers and project managers. It will be held in Boston MA on September 3rd-4th. Neil's Blog will keep you up to date.



This article has been viewed 2683 times.
Phil Factor

Author profile: Phil Factor

Phil Factor (real name withheld to protect the guilty), aka Database Mole, has 20 years of experience with database-intensive applications. Despite having once been shouted at by a furious Bill Gates at an exhibition in the early 1980s, he has remained resolutely anonymous throughout his career.

Search for other articles by Phil Factor

Rate this article:   Avg rating: from a total of 32 votes.


Poor

OK

Good

Great

Must read
 
Have Your Say
Do you have an opinion on this article? Then add your comment below:
You must be logged in to post to this forum

Click here to log in.


Subject: The Walrus and the Manager
Posted by: LANdango (view profile)
Posted on: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 at 6:41 PM
Message: I don't know how others feel about this article, but this is exactly what happened to a small company I worked for a while back.

The company was a small software company which spawned from another company having a long history with a large fortune 1000 company; nearly 20 years. The Newly formed Oyster company leveraged our "already a foot in the door" tactics to meet other Walruses and Managers.

We had verbal agreements that the software would be purchased across 40 locations across the United States providing the "Pilot" location was a success. We hired a lawyer and drew up the contract for the Pilot installation in which they did pay for some of the expenses in the form of a consultancy… (our "Mother Company" spent the resources to finish the contracts.)

We forged new relationship with new Managers and Walruses -- quite different from the Mother Company's relationships.

In the Pilot, the new Walruses had us put in the contract that we would release our source code if we went belly-up before 2 years.

Our management didn't recognize that Walrus was cracking our shell in the drying sun! We baked for nearly 5 years then died.

A waste of a good product!

So, be careful what you have in your contracts over time and also be wary of new walruses on familiar shores.

Cheers!

Subject: Good work
Posted by: Stonefish (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 8:23 AM
Message: This article is one of the best examples of Phil's insight into the world of software, as well as his cultured education. I am always interested in what he has to say and don't mind spending the time reading his articles. Keep up the good work Phil!

Subject: so true...
Posted by: randyvol (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Message: On your observation, "Note the subtlety of the dialogue; the naïve trust of corporate reasoning that projects that are 'slipping their dates' just need additional headcount to ensure that they come in on time..." I have been in schedules meetings more than once where in sheer frustration at the obstinate refusal of management to understand that it literally cannot be done in that amount of time, I blurt out - "Look 9 women in a room cannot birth a baby in one month. There are just some things that take as long as they take and throwing more 'bodies' at the problem is not going to do anything but add overhead."

I've come to the conclusion (at least here in the states) that this is not naive trust. Instead it is the calculated refusal to admit that the downsizing has gone past 'cutting fat' to 'cutting to the bone'; or as I like to call it 'stupid-sizing'.

Subject: Succinct to the Last
Posted by: gonzoinoz (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 6:47 PM
Message: As always, a pleasure to read and uncomfortably insightful.
I too have been on the inside especially where....
QUOTE
"The small businesses, on the other hand, are forced by their size to field people without the training for the ordeal."
UNQUOTE
I joined the company as a help desk operative and to be fair was paid and given responsibilities for that position. But due to my offering of other expertise as Programmer, SQL Server Developer (unbeknown to what was in store !) I was soon travelling the country and once overseas (seeing the sights), I too was beguiled into being the perveyor of all knowledge regarding the product. Not only didn't the product perform to all that the salesman sold, it was sold perporting functionality still in development. More heads were added and the timeframe increased beyond the promised dates. People left in droves and still they persisted. Why ? simple $$
QUOTE
"obstinate refusal of management to understand that it literally cannot be done in that amount of time"
UNQUOTE
I too now sit outside, watching the "train wreck" in slow motion.

Subject: Just brilliant...
Posted by: puzsol (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 at 6:49 PM
Message: Love your work Phil.... such a wise Oyster!

In response to randyvol, I agree whole-heartedly... the funny thing is that in Ecconomics, the law of diminishing and decreasing returns is well understood... do they just think that is doesn't apply to software production?

I love the image of Oysters in shoes... taken our of their environment and given gifts they didn't really need after all - how empty the promise of reward can be.

As a developer fairly new to the world of contracting, I really appreciate the insights shared here.

Thank you.


Subject: Ballard of Shoehorn
Posted by: Any Mouse (not signed in)
Posted on: Sunday, June 15, 2008 at 8:52 PM
Message: With no Requirement, milestone or documented acceptance at hand,
And No payment point or And no project planned.
Begin work we must, for delivery is soon,
Yelled the PM from his balloon.

But wait the scarred project staff decried,
Though omission, transcription or conniption the client may have shied,
Far from the truth, varied from the norm,
What scope have we to shift, they meeped forlorn.

Why no room at all a voice did appear
Belatedly from the upper adminisphere
On time,
In cost,
Faster than before
For you are well versed in this applications' lore.

Unsuited
Poor match
No access to users too
Grumbled the poor de-solute crew.
I must precipitate their is no solution here,
Your conception of planning I find quite queer.

The voice was lost,
Icarus had flown,
Upon hot air,
The product of his own.

To upper management you see,
Unburdened by the task of delivery,
His Mellifluous Bonus on this projects’ lucky few
Is only remembered by my inbox queue


 

















Level Playing Field
 The Federal Government in the States accepts tenders for their IT projects from a wide-range of... Read more...

Women in IT: Change at Every Level
 In the past, straight-forward sexism was a real problem in the IT industry – women in IT were... Read more...

Second Life: A Virtual World of Real Money
 As more and more people invest in alter egos to live a pseudo life online in Linden Labs' latest... Read more...

Andrew Tanenbaum: Geek of the Week
 Andrew Tanenbaum has had an immense influence on the way that operating systems are designed. He... Read more...

Ross Anderson: Geek of the Week
 Professor Ross Anderson is one of the foremost experts in Computer Security in the world. He has... Read more...

Linus Torvalds, Geek of the Week
 Linus Torvalds is remarkable, not only for being the technical genius who wrote Linux, but for then... Read more...

Driving up software quality - the role of the tester
 Have you ever wondered what a software tester does? Helen Joyce, test engineer at Red Gate software... Read more...

Coming Out as a Cancer Survivor - A Guide for Software Developers
 A personal perspective on the responsibilities of a cancer-surviving software developer Read more...

The Computer that Swore
 Database Developers occasionally get crazy ideas into their heads. Phil Factor should know; He... Read more...

The Writing on the Wall
 Phil Factor offers an intriguing theory on why so many, hugely complex, government IT projects fail. Is... Read more...

Over 150,000 Microsoft professionals subscribe to the Simple-Talk technical journal. Join today, it's fast, simple, free and secure.

Join Simple Talk