Av rating:
Total votes: 54
Total comments: 24


Richard Morris
The CV Detectives
12 October 2006

You may be shocked to hear this, but a lot of people in the technology market lie on their CV. In fact, a recent survey found that more people in UK technology lie about their qualifications than in any other sector.

The potential rewards for the would-be CV fraudster are high – but then, so is the potential cost to the company of employing the wrong person. If firms employ someone they believe has the experience they're looking for only to find out later that they don't, it can result in a messy divorce and cost the company large sums of money in re-advertising the position, retraining the new recruit and so on.

This is why, increasingly, companies are turning to "CV detectives" to make sure the person described on a CV is really the person they are getting…

Corporate bodyguards

"Please don't write that I'm some sort of control freak or anything special. I just probe into people's backgrounds and do an honest day's work," says former spy, Alan Marsh. A tall, 53-year-old, pony-tailed Londoner, Marsh turns a larger salary checking CVs than he ever did doing dirty deeds for the British Government.

People like Marsh are seen as the new breed of recruitment checker and corporate bodyguard in an age where job applicants seemingly will do anything to boost their chances of getting a position with a six-figure salary and generous perks.

This former counter-espionage man is now a counter-fraud expert. His is still a world of intrigue, excitement and secrets; though he's no longer hunting terrorist cells, the risks, if he gets it wrong, are still as high.

"Don't get me wrong - nobody is going to blow up the world, but the consequences of someone getting into a job they can't fulfill could cost that business tens of thousands of pounds in reputation alone. I can't allow that to happen."

The security issues emanating from people, whose silent aim in applying for any given position is to defraud a company or steal software or other intellectual rights, is enough to give any chief executive the odd sleepless night. If you don't believe me, then just ask Bill Gates.

Three years ago in two separate incidents, Microsoft employees, Richard Gregg and Daniel Feussner, illegally sold software worth a total of $26 million. Both former employees abused an internal ordering system at Microsoft known as MS Market.

The system allowed authorized employees to order, at zero cost, Microsoft software and hardware that was "for business use only". Gregg later served two years in prison and was ordered to pay Microsoft more than $5 million in restitution for software he had diverted. He later admitted that he had used the profits to pay off the mortgage on a house, bought a 1999 Land Rover Discovery and made a $48,000 payment on a 2002 M3 BMW.

Although the company has since changed its ordering system and is confident that there can be no further fraudulent activity, many agree that criminally-minded employees will always think that they are clever enough to try their arm and over-ride controls.

Lies, damned lies and Curriculum Vitae

Alan Marsh admits that the most common fabrications are, however, far from either being polished or refined. They involve exaggerating qualifications, inflating previous job titles and failing to mention being dismissed from a previous post.

Men in their early thirties are the ones most likely to be economical with the truth on both sides of the Atlantic, and the technology industry seems to attract more fibbers than any other, as Marsh is quick to point out.

"I carried out my own piece of research for a company by inventing a vacant post in the technology sector; it's what we call a 'dead drop' – a vacancy designed to attract a certain type of person, at a certain level. Out of those who replied, 70 per cent of males aged 30-35 lied about their qualifications or background. This ranged from covering up gaps in their careers to claiming non-existent degrees. Fraud in the technology market is big business, my friend," says Marsh. Names and contact details of those who bolstered their CVs are on the firm's recruitment blacklist; the practice of advertising 'dead drops', you may be surprised to learn, is far from rare.

In fact anti-fraud measures are rising as fast as identity theft, the biggest growth industry in the world. This is partly because it can be surprisingly easy for a convincing talker to wheedle his or her way into a company and be offered their dream job.

And although there may appear to be a widespread acceptance of embellishment in the average CV (after all a resumé needs to put the candidate in the best light), many human resource professionals believe that in the competitive job market, applicants feel under great pressure to play up their achievements, even to the extent of creating entirely new ones - and therein lies the problem.

To the sophisticated liar, false references can easily be forged because so few human resource departments, according to Marsh, bother checking them. Yet when human resource departments do carry out checks, two thirds of companies withdraw job offers at the last minute because of poor employment history.

If you happen to know the right individuals, then the world of corporate fraud is your oyster. Publishing programs can be readily bought and anyone with just a little skill can make letterheads, copied from websites, look authentic.

It is also very simple to rig up an office in a business center or virtual office, where calls are answered by receptionists and forwarded on to whoever is paying the account.

One City of London technology business recently uncovered an applicant who paid for a separate line to be installed in his house and then gave a friend £500 to lie for him. He was only caught after the personnel director thought the supposed former boss too obliging about his former employee's skills. It's a risky strategy, but then if the position attracts a large salary it is often seen as a risk worth taking, especially if a golden hello or starting bonus is part of the package.

It was the lure of a salary of over £150,000 that drove 29 year-old English graduate Clive Meadows (not his real name) to apply for a job as a projects consultant for a major international hardware firm. He had been a teacher of English for five years and was a keen computer hobbyist. Deeply in debt and with the risk of his bank foreclosing on his house, he applied for the job with a forged CV, barely expecting to be invited to interview. After the fifth interview, which involved psychometric profiling and ability tests, he was offered the post. Six weeks later and under a huge amount of strain, he resigned citing bereavement.

"I thought I could wing it with the knowledge I had of computer systems, but I became too stressed. I would have caused the business huge problems and stolen thousands of pounds in software before someone found me out. The interviews were hard going, but I beat 2,500 other hopefuls to get the job. It goes to show that even the largest firms checks can fail," he tells me.

On the trail of the fraudsters

In America, the number of technology companies screening potential employees is rising fast, with as many as 80 per cent calling in a 'CV detective' to root out the liars from the high-fliers. This type of investigator (including some who ask candidates for blood and urine samples for drug testing) may be relatively uncommon in the UK, but an increasing number of companies are signing up for similar investigations every day.

"The majority of companies in the UK believe CVs and application forms contain lies or exaggerations. Academic qualifications alone can't provide them with an accurate insight into whether a person has what it takes to succeed in a role," argues another freelance investigator Bob Roberts.

Roberts is a former investigative journalist, with a penchant for houndtooth check trousers. He goes to all sorts of lengths to check potential employees for his clients. Academic qualifications are verified by phoning universities and schools. Another tactic, in order to check that people are who they say they are, is to employ stool pigeons (usually attractive women for male candidates and men for females) who chat them up in bars and hotel rooms laid on by the company interviewing the candidates.

Private detectives trail people on buses, trains and aeroplanes to see where they go and whom they see, just in case a candidate might be into a bit of corporate espionage. Asked whether he thought all this clambering around and playing secret agents was a bit too much for a 65-year old former Fleet Street reporter, Roberts shared a recent experience.

"It is an absolute necessity of today's market-place," he says wearily. "Granted, it can be rather worrying if someone knows we're going to peer into their background but the honest candidate has nothing to be scared of. Our clients never question our methods and if people do, I relate the story of a 32-year-old who applied for a position as a software programmer. He was up for a job worth around £80,000 a year; with bonuses it would have added up to well over £100,000.

I was doing routine eavesdropping and discovered he was planning a robbery and kidnap at the firm who had hired him as a part-time consultant.

He had timed the security guards coming in and out, had the home addresses and telephone numbers of senior staff, and even photographs of some of their children. I was able to tip off the police the day before he was planning to strike.

They found 3 guns in his apartment, as well as teargas, handcuffs and other restraints. It was a highly unusual event and it's the first time I've come across anything so serious, but the threat is always there. I'm glad I made the right call," he says.

The day-to-day work of Roberts' mini-firm is nothing as dangerous. It involves him liasing with HR departments in all sizes of firms, from multi-nationals to 3 or 4 partner businesses. Once somebody has been offered a job, they will be told that further checks will be done into their history. This includes Roberts or his wife Patricia (a former British army intelligence officer) checking previous addresses, credit history, county court judgments and criminal records.

Roberts warns that he can swoop even after somebody has used a fraudulent CV to get a job. Many of his clients conduct further checks if somebody is promoted, or if they are moved to a more sensitive part of the company.

If someone is promoted to senior management, full investigations can go back ten years or more into somebody's history. Roberts spends hours in his car staking out an individual while armed with a digital camera or a camcorder. People he knows are not beyond breaking into someone's house by using an electric lock picking gun and then planting something called KeyKatch, a covert device which, when plugged into a computer, can document anything typed on the computer keyboard. The captured information can then be viewed at leisure by keying in a selected word.

High fliers can also be given a 'rigorous tabbing.' This can involve Roberts contacting neighbours, former partners, friends and anyone else who might have information to pass on about a successful candidate. Checks on media files (newspaper stories, broadcast history, websites) to see if there are nasty stories or 'strange pursuits' that they neglected to mention when being interviewed are also inspected. Rogers has visited 9 countries in the last 6 months in an effort to uncover what he views as 'vital information'. However, he is rewarded for his hard work; grateful clients paying him very well indeed, with each 'case' fetching in anything between £1500 and £5000 plus expenses.

If caught, the penalties for the wrongdoer can be far-reaching. Employers may be able to sue for recruitment and training costs, or call in the police if they think it appropriate. With 70 per cent of fraud being carried out by insiders, hiring the wrong person can be a very costly business.

Given what Roberts knows about fraudulent employees, what is his advice for the would-be employer?

"I would like to think that most employers are clever enough to detect lies at the interview stage but very few people have the skills. Psychometric tests and winkling out information from former employers can help, but I think the best way of hiring any new expensive employee is to make sure they are aware that someone is looking into their background."

As Roberts never tires from pointing out, he should know the tricks of the trade. He got his first break in journalism by pretending to be an experienced reporter after turning down his former 'career' as a housebreaker. It takes an excellent fraudster to know a good one.



This article has been viewed 11616 times.
Richard Morris

Author profile: Richard Morris

Richard Morris is a journalist, author and public relations/public affairs consultant. He has written for a number of UK and US newspapers and magazines and has offered strategic advice to numerous tech companies including Digital Island, Sony and several ISPs. He now specialises in social enterprise and is, among other things, a member of the Big Issue Invest advisory board. Big Issue Invest is the leading provider to high-performing social enterprises & has a strong brand name based on its parent company The Big Issue, described by McKinsey & Co as the most well known and trusted social brand in the UK.

Search for other articles by Richard Morris

Rate this article:   Avg rating: from a total of 54 votes.


Poor

OK

Good

Great

Must read
 
Have Your Say
Do you have an opinion on this article? Then add your comment below:
You must be logged in to post to this forum

Click here to log in.


Subject: Eye-opener
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Thursday, October 12, 2006 at 5:00 PM
Message: What an eye-opener but then great rewards always come with a price

Subject: Started a thread on this...
Posted by: Adam Machanic (view profile)
Posted on: Saturday, October 14, 2006 at 10:25 AM
Message: Here:

http://www.simple-talk.com/community/forums/2758/ShowThread.aspx

Subject: Insightful
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 at 4:49 PM
Message: That's an awesome article Richard. We need to see more of your writing!

Subject: Weird
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Thursday, October 19, 2006 at 8:47 PM
Message: I thought CV Frauds only happen in Indonesia... but this is a little bit shocking.

Subject: Oh yes
Posted by: WebMister (view profile)
Posted on: Friday, October 20, 2006 at 3:48 AM
Message: I've seen CV's being doctored many times, sometimes even by the agencies, though they usually try to persuade the job applicant to do it themselves. They usually ask them to alter the CV to 'emphasise the relevant skills', the current euphamism

Subject: CV?
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, October 20, 2006 at 7:36 AM
Message: Interesting. However, I'll bite, What does CV stand for.

Subject: Get Real
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, October 20, 2006 at 8:08 AM
Message: Even if a person lies on the resume they still have to get the work done to stay employed. I've fired people with excellent credentials because they couldn't get the job done and I've resigned from positions because I realized I had gotten in over my head. Many times companies need someone so bad and set expectations very high only to be dissappointed by those expectations. I don't think that a CV lie is a major problem, the problem comes from the inability to do the job your hired to do and accurate info or not if you can't tow the line you gotta go.

Subject: Job Requirements
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, October 20, 2006 at 8:22 AM
Message: Hi,

If employer put in job description page long requirements they will definitely find some one with all this knowledge with at least 5 years experience in each topic

Subject: CV?
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, October 20, 2006 at 10:38 AM
Message: CV is an abbreviation for Curriculum Vitae, for the most part the term is interchangeable with Resume

Subject: What choice is there?
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, November 03, 2006 at 6:42 AM
Message: Lets face it, if you never lied about your previous work, how would you ever get a better one.

Nobody will employ in the uk IT market unless someone has experience. Hence, the exaggeration of skills begin.

Only way to root them out is to perform tests.

Subject: Good Point But...
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, November 03, 2006 at 8:00 AM
Message: Exaggeration or adding on more to your qualifications on a CV is nothing surprising to me. I, myself, have committed this extravaganza in order to get notice for an opening I submitted myself to. In fact as a Senior Software Engineer I do believe you must try and tailor your resume to describe what you have done in your previous position... For instance add how much was the budget for the software you wrote... How many people did you lead or mentor while working on the software... How much money did it cost the company to create the software and how much money in turn they are expected in return... In many region can the word exaggerate come in play but in my case I always exaggerated about the expertise I had in a programming language; particularly the new one that emerges out of nowhere, like AJAX for example. All of a sudden you end up with 10 postings referencing you MUST have AJAX experience. Unless you lie about it on your resume, while on the other hand take a quick tour of its language features, then inevitably you will not be selected for the interview... When you attain a certain level of expertise in programming, for example, new programming languages entering the market place can be very easy to pick up if you already are savvy programmer. Which brings me also to my conclusion: many companies out there tend to exaggerate themselves about qualification for a given job. Here is a very nice example: why is it that every time I see a posting for a C# Programmer the C++ language is also a required skill? The job itself never uses the language...

Subject: Not Shocking at all
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, November 03, 2006 at 10:43 AM
Message: Let me tell you my experience. I am a SQL DBA and I got oppurtunity from a company where they need a SQL DBA with very good hands on a third party application named CINEGY. And to get that job I did lied and I did that job for my contract period for 6 months with out having any problem. But question I want to ask companies is they want good hands on many third party tools. And everytime you are out of a job you come to know about 100's of tools which you never heard of and to get job you lie. But can a company ever find a suitable candidate for them with hands of some XYZ tool? Last week got a requirement from a company where they want more than 2 years experience on SQL Server 2005. Ridiculous. What else can I say.

In IT industry you get one new software everyday and how can an IT consultant have hands on all those 1000's tools out there? Is it fair enough to ask them if they had experience on most?

Subject: freedom - better profiling
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Monday, November 06, 2006 at 3:39 AM
Message: People lie, thats a fact. Company lies on their job openings than why should not people lie on their cv's !?
I'm not one of them but I'm very angry on ammount of prejudice that companies have on interviews - yeah, you know in DEPTH SQL, Clustering, Clariion, BC/DR, ITIL, and you have dozen of that projects in past 3 years - ha ha.
Then I lie that about myself and cutting down work info to get pass. Ridicoulus.
So, everything is about lie, and responsibility for company loosing money or else after hiring people is only about famous role of HR managers.
good job! :)

Subject: freedom - better profiling
Posted by: Sinisa (view profile)
Posted on: Monday, November 06, 2006 at 4:06 AM
Message: and I'm more confident in my standing after reviewving who is Richard Morris - as a journalist he, i'm sure, know everything about lies. I'm not thinking anything bad - but he had sometimes to lie, right? Otherwise, how we can approve killing in Angola, Saigon.......
On editor is to cut down or add ammount of lies in news!!!
so, if you think twice, its everything in ammount of lies :)
good job editor, HR manager :)

Subject: fake cv
Posted by: quartz (view profile)
Posted on: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 at 5:11 AM
Message: a fake cv might get you an interview but not the job

Subject: Journalism
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 at 8:57 AM
Message: A UK survey recently stated journalists and politicians were the least liked in society. I don't agree with that as I've met some rather nasty personnel directors in my time. But to answer the question, I can safely say I have never willingly lied for any newspaper.

Subject: Journalism
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 at 8:59 AM
Message: A UK survey recently stated journalists and politicians were the least liked in society. I don't agree with that as I've met some rather nasty personnel directors in my time. But to answer the question, I can safely say I have never willingly lied for any newspaper.

Subject: lying ?
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 at 12:12 PM
Message: Ultimately, this is a reflection of society it self.... lying is society sanctioned in today's day and age.

Of course on an individual and a corporate level, I have yet to meet anyone who says that its OK to lie and cheat.

But everyone seems to be blissfully unaware when s/he does so in a white collar environment.

Its hard to imagine that folks who are at the top of the food chain (of companies having a HR department) themselevs are not complicit in this game.... lying... bigotry... etc.. are sanctioned in the upper classes of society... whats different that others are the bottom, or event the middle of the economic class pool are doing it?

Any company that has a PR deparment is essentially in the business of image control... its dedicated job is bend truth to present itself in the best light to society ...

The CV is an individual's PR department....

Definitely does not make it right... but then... let the first one who is blameless cast the stone....

in the meantime... the ferretting goes on as do the lies ...... and folks at the bottom of the cessspool also find a reason to make some money and stay alive.

Subject: CV Check
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 at 12:46 AM
Message: If, as in the UK, all data is protected under the Data Protection Act, how can a potentioal employee gain access to this information to check the authenticity of a persons CV?

Subject: Companies lie more!
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, March 16, 2007 at 1:09 PM
Message: Every company I have EVER worked for in IT lied about their position. The most common example is "We take training very seriously and invest in our employees" So many lies!

Also so many companies in IT don't seem to realise that if you have programmed tens of languages (and of different types e.g. functional, procedural, OO and the works), then you can usually adapt very quickly. I had 3 years experience in PHP5 and a job wanted PHP4 (the previous version), it took me 1 day to learn all the differences BUT when a company asked for 3 years of PHP4, then clearly I am not allowed to do that job!

BUT I can easily do it! That's where the joke lies.

It's like saying "we are looking for people who can drive mercedes cars", and then not allowing people with 20 years experience driving 10 different types of car, van etc... etc... I mean that would be plain dumb to say "no you aren't qualified", but this happens all the time with companies.

Companies lie FAR FAR FAR more than applicants.

Another point is that if most applicants massage the truth by a reasonable amount, then that means for you to get a job you have to lie as well.

Also when companies list 40 skills you MUST have... at offer £18k a year, please get a life! Similar to saying "Astronaut required by NASA, 1 pence per annum".

At one stage I had a lot of illness in jobs, and I had to have a lot of time off. I am better now, but I have a bad track record with illness. At one stage I appeared to be blacklisted (this was before slightly massaging my CV), so I had to send out a CV with some jobs missing (I didn't want to but the previous Human Resource Manager had it in for me), so I HAD to lie, otherwise NO JOB and therefore NO FOOD (and note I was overqualified for other jobs, no-one would allow me to get a job in a supermarket!!!!).

So in this case I had to lie or starve, (note I didn't want to be on benefits).

My brother worked for a company who lied to him about his role, he quite after 3 weeks, and told them why, so the shoe can be on the other foot. However most people seem to tolerate lies about the role, however companies normally sack people... hardly fair me thinks!

In the end I set up my own company which is doing very well, so thanks to those people not allowing me to be recruited, you did me a favour.

Subject: Data Protection Act (hahaha)
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, March 16, 2007 at 1:23 PM
Message:
Companies hold illegal information about you, check out this:

5.4. An organisation funded by private subscription operates in the U.K. and quite probably in Mannin as well, that maintains an employment blacklist. To avoid the Data Protection Act, all records are kept manually (although an illegal electronic database is almost certainly used in practice). No-one can find out directly whether or not they are a subject of this list. (Actual)


Citation (http://www.manxman.co.im/mecvan/archive/fofinformation.html)



Also note that companies legally get around this problem by having whitelists (a list of all the people who are ok, obviously a larger list, but then it works inside the law).

Also someone can easily find out information about you, I know that "they" (WOO-HA-HA) can find out EVERYTHING about you e.g.:

1) All names and addresses of your previous partners
2) All names and addresses your previous / current friends / people you drink with down the pub.
3) Lists of previous work colleagues.

After this you can start finding the cracks. They find out who doesn't really like you, and start fishing there. I mean it will scare you, but it's actually quite easy to do (it obviously takes FAR more skill to do this undetected).

Companies will just hire investigation companies to do the investigations for them, with a promise that if they get caught, they will not leave a papertrail back to the original company, hence there's little risk of getting caught.

Subject: Not what you expected?
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 at 7:59 PM
Message: In Australia the job market for skilled applicants is currently very good. Many companies pay bonuses to their employees for bringing someone 'on board', as they have difficulty recruiting and retaining new staff.

To get people interested, some firms will advertise a position and greatly embellish the job title or role. New employees sign on for jobs that fall well short of their expectations.

It's a delicate balance betwwen candidates who beef-up their resume, and companies who glorify the positions they need to fill.

Subject: Sorry, but what is kimerikas? Jane.
Posted by: sweeta-ct,Sorry, but what is kimerikas? Jane. (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 at 2:00 PM
Message: Sorry, but what is kimerikas?

Jane.

Subject: Lets face it....
Posted by: BusinessCritic (not signed in)
Posted on: Monday, May 12, 2008 at 3:31 AM
Message:

IT is a skill which most business people dont understand. Hence the reason, in the last 30 years IT has always come under the wing of the accountants. The accounting team has always needed IT to plow on with there jobs and have been the bridge between business and IT, and this is why after 30 years, its had to find a spot on the board room for IT.

IT recuiters, sorry to say this.... think they are goods gift, to business when really as meantioned in the orginal post, 'will do anything' (scum).

Thanks to this cycle of recuiters who do anything, and employers who want everything, the market has become this way in the UK.

What recuiters/business never realise until 'it stops working' is that moden day business cant survive without it....

 

















Level Playing Field
 The Federal Government in the States accepts tenders for their IT projects from a wide-range of... Read more...

Women in IT: Change at Every Level
 In the past, straight-forward sexism was a real problem in the IT industry – women in IT were... Read more...

Second Life: A Virtual World of Real Money
 As more and more people invest in alter egos to live a pseudo life online in Linden Labs' latest... Read more...

Andrew Tanenbaum: Geek of the Week
 Andrew Tanenbaum has had an immense influence on the way that operating systems are designed. He... Read more...

Ross Anderson: Geek of the Week
 Professor Ross Anderson is one of the foremost experts in Computer Security in the world. He has... Read more...

Linus Torvalds, Geek of the Week
 Linus Torvalds is remarkable, not only for being the technical genius who wrote Linux, but for then... Read more...

Driving up software quality - the role of the tester
 Have you ever wondered what a software tester does? Helen Joyce, test engineer at Red Gate software... Read more...

Coming Out as a Cancer Survivor - A Guide for Software Developers
 A personal perspective on the responsibilities of a cancer-surviving software developer Read more...

The Computer that Swore
 Database Developers occasionally get crazy ideas into their heads. Phil Factor should know; He... Read more...

The Writing on the Wall
 Phil Factor offers an intriguing theory on why so many, hugely complex, government IT projects fail. Is... Read more...

Over 150,000 Microsoft professionals subscribe to the Simple-Talk technical journal. Join today, it's fast, simple, free and secure.

Join Simple Talk